The development of the polymerase chain reaction (PCR), for which Kary Mullis received the 1992 Novel Prize in Chemical science, revolutionized molecular biology. At effectually the time that prize was awarded, enquiry was being carried out by Russel Higuchi which led to the discovery that PCR can be monitored using fluorescent probes, facilitating quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR). In improver, the before discovery of reverse transcriptase (in 1970) laid the groundwork for the development of RT-PCR (used in molecular cloning). The latter can be coupled to qPCR, termed RT-qPCR, assuasive analysis of cistron expression through messenger RNA (mRNA) quantitation. These techniques and their applications have transformed life science research and clinical diagnosis.

When discussing this topic, it is important to highlight the common misconception that RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR are synonymous. Indeed, the similarities between the closely related techniques often result in the incorrect employ of the acronyms. In an endeavor to forbid this, the Minimum Information for Publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Experiments (MIQE) guidelines, first published in 2009, proposed a standardization of abbreviations. They stated that 'RT-PCR' should only be used to describe reverse transcription PCR and non real-time PCR, as is oft confused. Reverse transcription PCR allows the use of RNA as a template to generate complementary DNA (cDNA). Using the reverse transcriptase enzyme, a single-stranded copy of cDNA is generated. This can then be amplified by a DNA polymerase, generating double-stranded cDNA, feeding into a standard PCR-based amplification procedure (encounter Figure 1A). This technique can be used in molecular cloning of genes of interest (GOIs), but most usually, it serves every bit the first footstep in RT-qPCR. Co-ordinate to MIQE, the acronym 'qPCR' describes quantitative real-time PCR, which is the PCR amplification of DNA in real fourth dimension, measured past a fluorescent probe, most unremarkably an intercalating dye or a hydrolysis-based probe, enabling quantitation of the PCR product (encounter Effigy 1B). This technique is used to observe the presence of pathogens and to make up one's mind the copy number of DNA sequences of interest. The final acronym 'RT-qPCR' is used for reverse transcription quantitative existent-time PCR. This is a technique which combines RT-PCR with qPCR to enable the measurement of RNA levels through the utilize of cDNA in a qPCR reaction, thus assuasive rapid detection of gene expression changes (run across Figure 1C). Despite these standardized abbreviations, information technology is important to note that this nomenclature guideline is not always adhered to, and qPCR is normally used to describe RT-qPCR. Similarly, RT is used to denote existent-time PCR rather than opposite transcription, thus causing confusion over which method is existence described. For this Beginner'south Guide, we will be using the MIQE abbreviations every bit described higher up.

Schematic comparing RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR. (A) RT-PCR workflow. RNA is isolated and cDNA is generated via reverse transcription (RT); PCR is then carried out to amplify areas of interest. (B) qPCR schematic. DNA is isolated and amplified; distension is quantitated using a probe which fluoresces upon intercalation with double-stranded DNA. (C) RT-qPCR procedure. RNA is isolated and cDNA generated before commencing a qPCR process.

Figure 1

Figure 1

Schematic comparing RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR. (A) RT-PCR workflow. RNA is isolated and cDNA is generated via contrary transcription (RT); PCR is then carried out to amplify areas of involvement. (B) qPCR schematic. Deoxyribonucleic acid is isolated and amplified; amplification is quantitated using a probe which fluoresces upon intercalation with double-stranded Dna. (C) RT-qPCR procedure. RNA is isolated and cDNA generated before commencing a qPCR procedure.

Effigy 1

Figure 1

Schematic comparing RT-PCR, qPCR and RT-qPCR. (A) RT-PCR workflow. RNA is isolated and cDNA is generated via reverse transcription (RT); PCR is then carried out to dilate areas of interest. (B) qPCR schematic. Dna is isolated and amplified; distension is quantitated using a probe which fluoresces upon intercalation with double-stranded DNA. (C) RT-qPCR procedure. RNA is isolated and cDNA generated before commencing a qPCR procedure.

Close modal

Quantitative PCR, whether involving a opposite transcription pace or not, is routinely used in molecular biological science labs and has revolutionized the fashion in which enquiry is carried out due to its relatively simple pipeline (Figure 2). Its advantages over standard PCR include the power to visualize which reactions take worked in real time and without the need for an agarose gel. It also allows truly quantitative analysis. One of the most common uses of qPCR is determining the copy number of a DNA sequence of involvement. Using accented quantitation, the user is able to determine the target copy numbers in reference to a standard curve of defined concentration in a far more authentic mode than ever earlier. RT-qPCR, on the other hand, allows the investigation of factor expression changes upon treatment of model systems with inhibitors, stimulants, small interfering RNAs (siRNAs) or knockout models, etc. This technique is also routinely used to observe changes in expression both prior to (every bit quality control) and later (confirmation of change) RNA-Seq experiments.

Workflow of a standard qPCR and RT-qPCR experiment. Following sample isolation, the integrity is analysed prior to cDNA generation and commencement of the qPCR assay using either intercalating dyes or hydrolysis probes. Fluorescence is detected throughout the PCR cycles and used to generate an amplification curve which is used to quantitate the target sample during data assay.

Figure 2

Figure 2

Workflow of a standard qPCR and RT-qPCR experiment. Following sample isolation, the integrity is analysed prior to cDNA generation and commencement of the qPCR assay using either intercalating dyes or hydrolysis probes. Fluorescence is detected throughout the PCR cycles and used to generate an amplification bend which is used to quantitate the target sample during data analysis.

Figure two

Figure 2

Workflow of a standard qPCR and RT-qPCR experiment. Following sample isolation, the integrity is analysed prior to cDNA generation and commencement of the qPCR analysis using either intercalating dyes or hydrolysis probes. Fluorescence is detected throughout the PCR cycles and used to generate an amplification bend which is used to quantitate the target sample during data analysis.

Shut modal

Sample training

The most crucial step in the qPCR and RT-qPCR pipeline is arguably sample isolation. No matter how good your assay blueprint is, if the starting material is contaminated or degraded, you will not get accurate results. A skilful-quality sample is the starting block of good-quality information. When isolating Dna for qPCR, it is essential that it is costless from contaminants that may inhibit the reaction. Virtually often, extraction is carried out using commercially available kits, which have the advantage of being user-friendly, simple and quick, specially when integrated with a robotic system. The type of RNA extraction carried out depends on the type of RNA required. The most common extraction method used is with total RNA extraction kits. This isolates messenger RNA (mRNA; the forerunner of protein synthesis), transfer RNA (tRNA; decodes mRNA during translation with the ribosome) and ribosomal RNA (rRNA; reads the amino acid order during translation and links them with the ribosome), but often (non always) fails to isolate smaller RNAs such as not-coding RNA (ncRNA; functional RNA transcribed from DNA, only not translated into proteins) and micro RNAs (miRNAs; regulate gene expression by inhibiting mRNA translation). With the explosion of interest in enhancer RNAs (eRNAs; small RNAs transcribed from enhancers) which can vary in length considerably, it is essential that the extraction methods are carefully considered to ensure isolation of the RNA of interest. In addition to extraction considerations, it is essential that RNA is not contaminated with Dna, since this cannot be distinguished from cDNA in the qPCR reaction. To overcome this, most protocols rely on the utilize of a DNase I treatment which digests whatsoever DNA.

During isolation, sample deposition is always a possibility. Accordingly, any skillful pipeline volition involve a quality control step to assess the integrity of the sample. This can be washed apace by evaluating the A260/280 ratio (comparing the absorbance at 260 vs 280 nm, a measure of contamination by proteins) and the A260/230 ratio (260 vs 230 nm, an indication of the presence of organic contaminants) of the sample; still, this is not very accurate and is subject area to interference from several factors. A more than accurate measure out is the utilise of a virtual gel electrophoresis system such as the Aligent Bioanalyser. This system works using a chip that separates RNA based on size and detects RNA by fluorescent dyes. This is then translated to a computer which, using an algorithm, produces an RNA integrity number (RIN) which represents the quality of the sample, with x existence the highest.

The terminal step in sample grooming for RT-qPCR is the generation of cDNA. cDNA utilizes RT-PCR (Figure 1) to generate cDNA from the RNA template using a reverse transcriptase. This tin can exist done employing oligo(dT) primers, which anneal to the polyA tail of RNA, or using random hexamers (primers of half dozen to nine bases long, which amalgamate at multiple points along the RNA transcript). More often than not, a mix of the two primers is thought to be all-time as information technology enables distension of polyA tail RNA (mainly mRNA) and non-polyA–containing RNA (tRNA, rRNA, etc). In addition to the primer consideration, cDNA generation tin be part of the qPCR experiment (termed one-step RT-qPCR) or is generated separately from the qPCR (2-pace RT-qPCR), equally shown in Figure three. The advantage of one-footstep RT-qPCR is that in that location is less experimental variation and fewer risks of contamination, besides as enabling high-throughput screening; hence, this option is usually used for clinical screening. However, it does mean that the sample can only be used a express number of times, whereas 2-stride RT-qPCR enables more reactions per sample and flexible priming options and is normally the preferred selection for wide-scale gene expression assay, just does require more optimization.

One-step vs two-step RT-qPCR. One-step RT-qPCR involves the generation of cDNA via reverse transcription and qPCR amplification of the target sequence in one reaction. Ii-step RT-qPCR separates out the two steps (RT-PCR and qPCR), thus enabling more target sequences to be analysed in the qPCR reaction.

Effigy 3

Figure 3

One-stride vs two-step RT-qPCR. One-footstep RT-qPCR involves the generation of cDNA via reverse transcription and qPCR distension of the target sequence in ane reaction. Two-step RT-qPCR separates out the two steps (RT-PCR and qPCR), thus enabling more target sequences to exist analysed in the qPCR reaction.

Figure 3

Figure 3

1-step vs two-stride RT-qPCR. One-step RT-qPCR involves the generation of cDNA via reverse transcription and qPCR amplification of the target sequence in 1 reaction. Two-stride RT-qPCR separates out the 2 steps (RT-PCR and qPCR), thus enabling more target sequences to be analysed in the qPCR reaction.

Close modal

Detection methods

The adjacent nigh of import decision when designing your experimental pipeline is choosing the method of detection. All are based on the emission of fluorescence, just the chemistry behind them differs. I method is the utilize of a fluorescent dye which binds non-specifically to double-stranded Dna as it is generated. SYBR® Dark-green is the most mutual intercalating dye and emits a fluorescent signal upon intercalating with newly synthesized Deoxyribonucleic acid. The more than the DNA generated in the qPCR reaction, the more fluorescence is detected (Figure 4A). The 2nd method of detection uses hydrolysis probes such every bit TaqMan® probes, which depend on Förster Resonance Energy Transfer (FRET) preventing the dye moiety from emitting a signal via the quencher when the probe is intact (Effigy 4B). These probes are specific sequences which are designed to bind downstream of the qPCR primers. The 5′ end of the probe is labelled with a fluorescent reporter such equally the carboxyfluorescein (FAM) moiety; on the iii′ end is a quencher molecule which prevents fluorescent emission when in close proximity to the reporter. As DNA polymerase extends the primer, the probe is cleaved, enabling the reporter molecule to emit a fluorescent signal.

Comparison of intercalating dye and hydrolysis-based probe detection. (A) SYBR® Dark-green detection: Post-obit denaturation of cDNA, primers anneal and are extended. During extension, SYBR Green binds to the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), emitting a fluorescent signal detected by the qPCR instrument.(B) TaqMan® probe detection: TaqMan probes demark downstream of the primers to single-stranded cDNA. During extension, the polymerase breaks up the probe, assuasive the fluorescent indicate to be detected due to the loss of proximity to the quencher moiety. (C) Melt bend graph for primer specificity: A melt curve measures the dissociation of dsDNA at high temperatures. A unmarried Dna species (produced from a specific primer pair) will result in a single peak (blackness line), and multiple Deoxyribonucleic acid species or primer dimers will consequence in 2 or more peaks (purple) and indicate non-specific primers.

Effigy 4

Figure 4

Comparing of intercalating dye and hydrolysis-based probe detection. (A) SYBR® Green detection: Following denaturation of cDNA, primers anneal and are extended. During extension, SYBR Green binds to the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), emitting a fluorescent signal detected by the qPCR instrument.(B) TaqMan® probe detection: TaqMan probes demark downstream of the primers to single-stranded cDNA. During extension, the polymerase breaks up the probe, allowing the fluorescent signal to be detected due to the loss of proximity to the quencher moiety. (C) Cook curve graph for primer specificity: A melt curve measures the dissociation of dsDNA at loftier temperatures. A unmarried DNA species (produced from a specific primer pair) will result in a single pinnacle (blackness line), and multiple DNA species or primer dimers will result in two or more than peaks (purple) and signal non-specific primers.

Figure 4

Figure 4

Comparison of intercalating dye and hydrolysis-based probe detection. (A) SYBR® Green detection: Following denaturation of cDNA, primers anneal and are extended. During extension, SYBR Greenish binds to the double-stranded DNA (dsDNA), emitting a fluorescent signal detected by the qPCR musical instrument.(B) TaqMan® probe detection: TaqMan probes bind downstream of the primers to single-stranded cDNA. During extension, the polymerase breaks upward the probe, allowing the fluorescent signal to exist detected due to the loss of proximity to the quencher moiety. (C) Melt bend graph for primer specificity: A cook bend measures the dissociation of dsDNA at high temperatures. A single DNA species (produced from a specific primer pair) will upshot in a single peak (blackness line), and multiple DNA species or primer dimers volition result in two or more peaks (majestic) and betoken non-specific primers.

Close modal

Since such probes are target specific, they inherently accept greater specificity than intercalating dyes. Consequently, when you detect a point using a probe, you lot tin be confident that the signal is genuinely from your GOI, since it requires the primers and the probe to bind at the target sequence for signal detection. Intercalating dyes, notwithstanding, are non-specific, and therefore, further downstream analysis in the grade of a melt curve is required to ensure that the signal being detected is genuinely the target of interest (Figure 4C). This tin also be aided by the apply of carefully designed primers and by validating their specificity, for which at that place are many examples online including the Harvard primer bank. More recently, new-generation intercalating dyes such as EvaGreen® have been adult, which have lower background dissonance and a stronger signal, enabling improved melt curve analysis and amplification detection. Despite their disadvantages, intercalating dyes are significantly cheaper to utilize than probes, as y'all can utilize the same dye for multiple different primer pairs (as long every bit the reactions are run separately). Since hydrolysis probes are sequence specific, every GOI requires an individual prepare of primer pairs and probe. In issue, this method is commonly merely chosen if the user wants to mensurate just a few targets of involvement, such as in diagnostic testing. Since the development of the first commercial qPCR machines, instrumentation has come a long way in terms of both reliability and sensitivity. From the first machines, which could mensurate a small number of samples, we are at present able to deport out high-throughput screening using 96- and 384-well plates. This advance is farther enhanced through the development of detection systems. The detection of multiple emission spectra in many newer machines enables multiplexing of up to five or six colours at one fourth dimension, facilitating high-throughput assay in shorter periods of time.

Quantitation and data analysis

Existent-time detection of the qPCR bike results in an amplification bend with initiation, exponential and plateau phases (Effigy 5A). This curve forms the basis of quantitation. When amplification starts, the level of fluorescence is low and is used to ready the baseline level of fluorescence. Every bit the reaction progresses into the exponential growth, fluorescence reaches a level which is significantly higher than the baseline; this is referred to as the threshold level. The threshold level is the heart of quantitation, as the point at which your sample crosses this threshold is recorded as the Ct or Cq value. The threshold is set in the exponential stage, so the reading is not affected past reagent shortages, etc. in the plateau phase. The second crucial factor in quantitation is the apply of a reference gene (RG), an endogenous control present in all samples at a consequent concentration which does not alter in response to biological conditions. Ofttimes, genes such as GAPDH and β-actin are used; notwithstanding, the levels of these transcripts tin can change in certain conditions, thus information technology is essential that the RGs are matched to the experiment.

Quantitation of RT-qPCR and qPCR. (A) Amplification bend generated during the run as the reaction is measured in real time. Due to fluorescence detection, an amplification curve is generated (blue curve) which involves an initiation phase [low level of fluorescence, often termed the baseline (black line)]. A threshold is determined (green line) once the amplification curve is in the exponential phase, and where the amplification crosses this line determines the Cq/Ct value used to quantify data. Negative controls, i.e., water controls, should be around the baseline value. (B) A serial dilution of standards of known concentration are used to generate a distension bend, which when Cq values are plotted against their log concentrations produce a standard curve. Target sequences of unknown concentrations tin can and then be accurately quantified using their Cq as shown by the hashed cyan line.

Figure five

Figure 5

Quantitation of RT-qPCR and qPCR. (A) Distension curve generated during the run as the reaction is measured in real time. Due to fluorescence detection, an amplification bend is generated (blue curve) which involves an initiation phase [low level of fluorescence, oftentimes termed the baseline (black line)]. A threshold is adamant (green line) in one case the amplification bend is in the exponential phase, and where the amplification crosses this line determines the Cq/Ct value used to quantify information. Negative controls, i.eastward., h2o controls, should be around the baseline value. (B) A serial dilution of standards of known concentration are used to generate a amplification bend, which when Cq values are plotted against their log concentrations produce a standard curve. Target sequences of unknown concentrations tin then be accurately quantified using their Cq as shown by the hashed cyan line.

Figure 5

Figure 5

Quantitation of RT-qPCR and qPCR. (A) Amplification bend generated during the run every bit the reaction is measured in existent time. Due to fluorescence detection, an distension bend is generated (blue curve) which involves an initiation stage [low level of fluorescence, often termed the baseline (black line)]. A threshold is determined (green line) one time the amplification curve is in the exponential phase, and where the amplification crosses this line determines the Cq/Ct value used to quantify information. Negative controls, i.east., h2o controls, should be effectually the baseline value. (B) A serial dilution of standards of known concentration are used to generate a amplification curve, which when Cq values are plotted confronting their log concentrations produce a standard curve. Target sequences of unknown concentrations tin then be accurately quantified using their Cq as shown past the hashed cyan line.

Close modal

To analyse the data, there are ii types of quantitation methods to choose from, accented and relative. Absolute quantitation is the most rigorous in terms of controls. Each reaction requires a standard of known concentration for the RG and GOI, for which a standard curve is generated using the log concentrations and the Ct value (Figure 5B). This standard curve tin can then be used to quantitate the concentration of the unknown experimental samples and is ofttimes used for identifying DNA copy numbers. The second approach is relative quantitation, which enables you to summate the ratio between the RG and the GOI. The accuracy of this quantitation depends on the RG; therefore, it is crucial that this remains unchanged, and then every bit to foreclose erroneous results. The method used to limited the ratio between the RG and GOI is chosen the delta delta Ct method (2-ΔΔCq). The Ct (Figure 5A) of the RG is removed from the GOI Ct, so as to remove any errors in sample loading. This generates a ΔCt value for all samples, which is then compared back to a command sample to generate the ΔΔCt. This method is more often than not used for comparing healthy vs disease samples, etc.

RT-PCR has been used to discover the viruses responsible for respiratory infections in public health for many years. With the contempo outbreak of SARS-CoV-2, the virus causing Covid-nineteen, the use of real-time RT-PCR has come to the forefront of research. The conversion of RT-PCR testing to real-time RT-PCR or RT-qPCR allows high-throughput screening of patients, which is disquisitional during a public wellness emergency. These tests have been rapidly designed post-obit the deposition of the SARS-CoV-2 genome allowing prompt blueprint of primers and probes specific for Covid-19. The nearly common test for SARS-CoV-two, which has been implemented by the World Wellness Arrangement (WHO), Public health England (PHE) and National Health Service (NHS) laboratories, is real-fourth dimension RT-PCR (RT-qPCR) using a system similar to TaqMan probes. The Drosten group, based in Berlin, has designed a real-fourth dimension RT-PCR assay which detects the RdRp gene of SARS-CoV-two and involves isolation of RNA and subsequent 1-pace real-time RT-PCR using fluorescent probes designed for the RdRp cDNA. A second collaborative group based in Hong Kong has designed a similar examination employing two one-footstep RT-qPCR assays using fluorescent probes for alternative SARS-CoV-two genes, called ORF1b and the N gene. These two real-time assays can be scaled up onto large automated qPCR machines, thus enabling rapid detection with high sensitivity and selectivity over similar coronaviruses such equally the virus causing SARS. Consequently, information technology is clear that besides as beingness a powerful investigative technique in life sciences research labs, this technique is a strong contender for rapid diagnostics in current and future public wellness emergencies.

  • Liu, Y., Cao, Y., Wang, T. et al. (2019) Detection of 12 common food-borne bacterial pathogens by TaqMan Existent-Time PCR using a single set of reaction conditions, Forepart. Microbiol. 10, 222 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2019.00222

  • Bustin, Due south.A. Benes, V., Garson, J.A., et al. (2009) The MIQE guidelines: Yardinimum Information for publication of Quantitative Real-Time PCR Eastwardxperiments, Clin. Chem. 55, 611–622. DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2008.112797

  • Nolan, T., Huggett, J. and Sanchez, East. (2013) Adept practice guide for the awarding of quantitative PCR (qPCR), LGC . https://www.gene-quantification.de/national-measurement-system-qpcr-guide.pdf [Accessed ten June 2020]

  • Livak, Yard.J. and Schmittgen, T.D. (2001) Analysis of relative cistron expression data using existent-time quantitative PCR and the two(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods. 25, 402–408. DOI:10.1006/meth.2001.1262

  • Sheridan, C. (2020) Coronavirus and the race to distribute reliable diagnostics, Nat. Biotechnol. 38, 379–391. DOI: 10.1038/d41587-020-00002-2

  • Corman, V.Thousand., Landt, O., Kaiser, M., et al. (2020) Detection of 2019 novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) by real-fourth dimension RT-PCR. Euro. Surveill. 25, DOI: 10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.iii.2000045

  • Chu, D.K.W., Pan, Y., Cheng, S.Chiliad.Due south., et al. (2020) Molecular diagnosis of a novel coronavirus (2019-nCoV) causing an outbreak of pneumonia, Clin. Chem. 66, 549–555 DOI: ten.1093/clinchem/hvaa029

graphic

Grace Adams is a postdoctoral researcher in the Department of Molecular and Jail cell Biology at the University of Leicester. She started in the field of Biochemistry in 2010 as an undergraduate at the University of Leicester. During her PhD, she worked with Professor Shaun Cowley to study the role of Class I Histone Deacetylases in factor expression. In both her PhD and postdoctoral piece of work Grace used RT-qPCR extensively to study factor expression changes. Electronic mail: gea8@leicester.ac.u.k.